Sara says:

She’s gorgeous, very wholesome looking if you know what i mean, but WHAT HAVE THEY DONE TO HER CHEST?! That is a very low cut dress she is wearing, and miss Scarlett is not exactly small chested and now look… no cleavage!!! Were the boobs too much for the cover? They may well be but then DON’T PUT HER IN THAT BLEEDIN DRESS!!! This photo shoping is just insane, it’s no longer about enhancing, it’s altering beyond all recognition! Why not just put a plastic doll on the cover?

steffi says:

The cover is so American … a perfect icon of the 50s

amanda marzolini says:

I dont’ like this cover! too old fashionaed, always the same Scarlett!
omg i can’t believe VOGUE america can be so boring!! in 2012,
come on ANNA WINTOUR, refresh your VOGUE!!!
however Scarlett is better with her natural hair and “current”dress!
i don’t understand this 50′ style ! why?
definetely she’s a spoilt actress and i always prefer models on magazine cover, more more beautiful!

amy

http://thefashionamy.blogspot.it/

Johanne says:

Absolutely stunning! So classic in a ‘new’ way, if that even makes sense. Makes me proud of being danish.

kaloka says:

I registered at vogue.com and subscribe for the 12 issues at $19.99…then it came out as not valid since they accept US address only. Now Im sad but right Scarlett is gorgeous on the cover!

http://kaloka.livejournal.com

double-concept says:

she is perfect!!!!

http://double-concept.blogspot.it

annette says:

that’s because she’s photo-shopped to hell and back. i’ve seen her in person and she’s lovely, really cute, fresh-faced. but this is enhanced turquoise eyes, whitened teeth, retouched skin, perfectly resting gown, etc… think of these covers as ‘paintings’. which is what they are. so a dazzling scarjo painting…yeah, okay, i get that. xoxox, annette

Monika says:

Agree with your opinion, she is gorgeous on this cover.

dimitri says:

Scarlett Johansson looks great in this Vogue cover. It’s a beautiful cover.